The direct ownership of spray boom production is the latest step in Case IH’s strategic road map for its sprayer product platform. As the company works to enhance its application-product offering, the inclusion of longer, lighter booms enables accelerated development and deployment of new technologies. These solutions will be implemented across the Case IH product portfolio.

“We are thrilled to be working so closely with Specialty, which has been a fantastic partner to Case IH over the last few years as we deliver more productive application solutions. This acquisition strengthens our in-house capabilities and allows us to retain key strategic personnel to ensure continuity in this vertical integration.”

said Scott Harris, Case IH global president.

The acquisition of Specialty signals Case IH’s continued commitment to Agronomic Design — helping operators maximize yield and ROI potential. As aluminum spray booms are up to 50% lighter than their steel counterparts, they result in less field compaction, less rutting and better weight distribution.

“At Case IH, one of our primary crop production goals is to help operators cover more acres more efficiently — with solutions that are built to last. This acquisition will be key to providing operators with the equipment and agronomic solutions they need to feed a growing world.”

said Monte Weller, Case IH global product manager for Crop Production and Hay & Forage product lines.

Specialty is known for its advanced engineering and high-quality workmanship as a world-class welding operation. The company’s sprayer boom design incorporates multiple patents to virtually eliminate the fatigue cracking associated with other aluminum boom designs. The aluminum used by Specialty is sourced and extruded in the United States.

The post CNH Acquires Spray Manufacturer Specialty Enterprises, Reinforcing Global Leadership in Crop Protection Equipment appeared first on North America FarmQuip Magazine.

Whether it’s mixing spray agents, monitoring application results in the field, or cleaning off the spray boom – plant protection measures come with a risk to health for the operator. Skin, eyes, airways, and mucous membranes can be damaged by direct contact with active ingredients or by breathing in vapors and gases. With the new Safety Kit, Amazone offers essential protection to prevent these health risks. The safe, comfortable operation of Amazone machinery, and a high degree of safety when working with plant protection agents are of high importance to Amazone.

The personal protective equipment kit consists of protective gloves, a sleeved apron, safety glasses, and a respirator with an active filter, as well as an eye rinsing bottle and disinfectant. All items in the Safety Kit are DIN or EN certified and can be safely stored in the accompanying Safety Kit case.

The certified sleeved apron with fastening at the back is particularly useful as the durable, robust item is quick to put on and take off. When worn with long-sleeved work clothing, it protects the majority of the upper body, arms, and legs.

The Amazone Safety Kit is available in sizes M and XL for a price of 195.00 EUR plus VAT. The kit can not only be conveniently ordered with a new Amazone crop protection sprayer but can also be purchased separately from the local dealer.

The post Stay on the Safe Side with the Amazone Safety Kit appeared first on North America FarmQuip Magazine.

With some exceptions, producers of agricultural commodities (crop, livestock, dairy, or aquaculture) for which prices declined by 5% or more were eligible for a CFAP payment (Johansson et al., 2020). Some commodities (such as hemp, alfalfa mustard, etc.), for which price data were not available, were also eligible for payments under CFAP (Johansson et al., 2020). A third program for which agricultural producers qualified was the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) administered by the Small Business Administration (SBA). The PPP was designed to help small businesses keep employees on the payroll and offset some of their operating costs.

The maximum loan amount, which was forgivable if used during the 24-week period following the first disbursement of the loan on eligible expenses (payroll and allowed overhead expenses), was 2.5 times the monthly average profit plus payroll costs, including eligible overhead costs (employer insurance payments, employer unemployment taxes, etc.) (SBA, 2020). PPP data on each of the loans, including agricultural businesses loans, were released on December 1, 2020. This article examines the PPP participation rate, the average amount received, and PPP distributions relative to labor cost at the state level for the agriculture sector.

Government Support Programs

U.S. agricultural producers rely on the USDA for grants and other government payments administered under the Farm Bill. Ad hoc programs—such as the Market Facilitation Program (MFP), which provided direct payments to producers in response to retaliatory tariffs, and CFAP—are also administered by the USDA. Other federal departments and agencies were responsible for managing other ad hoc support programs created to provide assistance to compensate for losses caused by the pandemic. The 2021 Omnibus Appropriations Bill, which the U.S. Congress passed in December 2020 and President Trump signed into law, renewed the PPP, adding almost $300 billion; small businesses, including agricultural businesses, started applying and receiving loans in 2021. The 2021 American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act also includes an additional $50 billion for continued PPP loans.

Family farms accounted for more than 98% of all farms in 2019 (Whitt, Todd, and MacDonald, 2020). Because such farms play an important role in rural economies, the PPP program had and will continue to have a substantial impact on the economic wellbeing of rural America. Better understanding of various aspects of the PPP loans can provide lessons for the design and implementation of future programs aimed at supporting small businesses in general and rural farm businesses in particular.

Analysis of PPP Loans to Agricultural Producers

We use data at the PPP participant level from the SBA, along with microdata from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) and USDA’s state-level employment data from the Farm Income and Wealth data product for our analysis. ARMS, administered annually by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) and the Economic Research Service (ERS), is the most comprehensive source of data on economic variables related to the farm sector, including labor expenses. The data released by the SBA provide information on the loan size and number of jobs retained.

However, the SBA data alone do not provide any information on the impact of PPP loans on producers. Data on labor expenses from ARMS and farm income and wealth statistics (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2020b) help connect SBA data to labor expenses to gain meaningful insights. Ideally, 2020 ARMS data, which collects information on participating farm operations for the year 2020, would show the impact of PPP on producers. The most recent ARMS data, however, are from the 2019 ARMS and, therefore, we use these data to provide a benchmark for the analysis.

Data released by the SBA show that more than $525 billion in PPP payments were disbursed through more than 5.2 million loans in 2020. Based on the 2019 ARMS data, 72% of all commercial farm operations had either positive net income or positive payroll expenditures, and therefore would meet the two most important requirements for eligibility to apply for PPP loans. Individual SBA loan data show that almost 121,000 (17% of eligible farm operations based on ARMS data) applied for a total of $5.9 billion in PPP loans (Table 1). SBA reports an average loan amount of $48,517.

Table 1 shows that crop farm operations applied for PPP loans at a higher rate (21% of eligible farm operations) compared to livestock farms (12% of those eligible). Of the total $5.9 billion in PPP loans, $2.1 billion (35%) went to livestock operations, and the remaining $3.8 billion (65%) went to crop operations. The number of employees paid by PPP loan in the crop sector (501,310) is more than twice that of the livestock sector (235,141). This is most likely because for many crop operations, labor cost as a share of total gross farm income is higher than for many livestock operations (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2020a).

The major objective of the PPP was to allow employers who applied for and received the loan to pay employees by covering payroll expenses. Producers without employees but with positive net income were provided with funds to cover their income (in this case, their net returns, which are defined and counted as income by sole proprietors). A business had to use at least 60% of the loan amount for payroll expenses in order to receive full loan forgiveness in the 24-week period after receiving the PPP loan.

No information on the proportion of the PPP loans used for payroll expenses, as opposed to the amounts used for other authorized spending, is available. To compare the loan amounts to payroll expenses, we consider an upper bound (entire loan used for payroll) and a lower bound (60% of the loan used for payroll). Neither bound is exact, as more likely than not farm businesses used between 60% and 100% of the loan volume for payroll expenses but the bounds provide insights into annual payroll expenses relative to total PPP loan.

Funds from the PPP loans had to be disbursed within 24 weeks of receiving the loan, largely to allow greater flexibility in planning and use of funds. Table 2 shows that the disbursed PPP loans amounted to 22% of total annual hired labor expenses for the farm sector so if all loans were used to on hired labor wages, they would cover slightly more than 2.6 months of the year (2.6/12 months = 22%). Operations in the livestock sector would cover 26%, or slightly more than 3 months of labor expenses, while those in the crop sector would cover 20% (about 2.4 months). It is important to note that not all farms qualified and not all farms that qualified applied, as stated above, and the labor costs are for all farm operations.

If farm operations were to use only 60% of the PPP loans on hired labor expenses, the minimum required to receive full forgiveness of the PPP loan, this would offset 13% of the labor expenses, or about 1.6 months of payroll expenditures (Table 2). Loans to the livestock sector applied exclusively to wages would cover 16%, or almost 2 months of labor expenses, while loans to the crops sector would cover 12%, about 1.5 months (Table 2).

Three limitations of these results should be noted:

1. We do not factor in profit or net returns that are allowed by the PPP,
2. labor expenses are not uniform throughout the year and therefore may not match up with the 24-week window targeted by PPP, and
3. we assume that all loans will be forgiven.

The third limitation is a significant one that could change the results. We do not know yet whether the forgiveness conditions have been met since the SBA has not released any data on PPP loan forgiveness. If PPP recipient farm operations do not meet loan forgiveness criteria and have to return some money, it will affect the number of months the PPP loans covered, the jobs retained, and the labor costs they offset. Further, changes in the labor situation after receiving the loan could also affect the results. For instance, a farm employee leaving work after the farm operator has received the PPP loan would change the payroll cost thereby changing the results. The number of jobs retained are self-reported numbers by the PPP applicants. The exact number of jobs retained will be known after the loan forgiveness information is available. Because the lenders are still processing new loans, it is unlikely that data on forgiveness will be available in the near term.

The analyses and results in this paper should be interpreted as preliminary, intended to provide insights into the impact of the PPP on U.S. producers. Many producers claim the net returns to the farm enterprise as family income at the end of the year. This analysis does not include these net returns. Finally, since not all eligible farm operations applied for the PPP loans, some farms will not have been able to offset any hired labor expenses.

Distribution of PPP Loans for Agricultural Operations across the United States

The largest loan total of $1.2 billion was made to California producers (Figure 1). The highest average loan ($170,745) was made to California producers and the lowest average loan ($19,931) was received by South Dakota producers. This is expected as California had the highest average hired labor expense ($193,165) and highest average net farm income ($256,953) based on the 2019 ARMS data. Further, the contribution of Californian producers to total U.S. cash receipts was highest, at $53 billion (13% of total cash receipts) (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2020b). The lowest total loan amount ($3.9 million) was made to producers in Alaska. This is also an expected result as the contribution of Alaskan producers to the total cash receipts was only $61 million (less than 1% of total cash receipts) (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2020b).

Based on data provided by the SBA, the maximum number of agricultural jobs retained, 136,692, were those of California workers and the lowest number, 396, were retained in Alaska.

These states are part of what the Economic Research Service calls the “Fruitful Rim” (Heimlich, 2000), which is characterized by production specialized in fruit, vegetables, and cotton, which are relatively labor intensive compared with other crop production. The Heartland and parts of the Northern Crescent also realized higher-than-average total job retention. These states make up the Midwest and Upper Midwest and are specialized in cash grains and dairy production.

We use 60% of the PPP loan totals since loan forgiveness was predicated on 60% of each loan going to labor expenses. Some states with relatively high labor costs—like California, Washington, and Florida—were among those with the lowest PPP loans as a share of total labor expenses. Generally, states with relatively high PPP loans as a share of hired labor expenses were those with the lowest total annual labor expenses. However, there is no clear pattern: Missouri received the highest PPP loans as a share of hired labor expenses but had the 15th lowest labor expenses for 2019.

Based on our calculations, only 17% of farm operations participated in the PPP. Figure 4 shows the participation rate across states, calculated as the number of participants divided by the number of eligible farms (farm operations with positive net income or positive payroll). The participation rate varies widely, from 88% in Idaho to 3% in West Virginia. The average loan size for Idaho producers was $96,159 and for West Virginia producers it was $39,194.

There is considerable geographic variation in the participation rates. In addition to Idaho, high participation rates are clustered in the Heartland and Northern Great Plains regions, which specialize in cash grains, wheat, cattle and sheep production. Participation rates were lower in Texas, New Mexico, and states comprising the Southern Seaboard. Data on the number of eligible farms were not available for Hawaii and Alaska.

It appears that the PPP program helped to pay a significant number of employees in the agricultural sector and contributed to the general economic well-being of rural America. However, the participation rate of eligible producers was fairly low, most likely because the PPP program was a new program and was administered by a different agency than the usual contact agency with which farmers are familiar (USDA).

There were only about 121,000 applications for the PPP program, which is significantly lower than the number of applications for the USDA administered CFAP even though both programs are new ad hoc programs designed to provide aid to those affected by the pandemic. As of the end of 2020, there were 652,201 and 880,971 approved applications for CFAP 1 and CFAP 2 programs, respectively, showing a significantly higher participation rate for programs administered by the USDA. It is important to note that the requirements for the two programs, PPP and CFAP, were different.

If all eligible farm operations had applied for the PPP loans, at the average loan amount based on data from SBA, farm operations would have received $35.7 billion compared to the $5.9 billion actually received. Since the PPP program has been renewed in the new relief program and there are additional funds, simply increasing the participation rate would provide more relief to the agricultural sector and rural America in general. Based on the SBA (2021) announcement, the first draw of the PPP loans will be for borrowers who have not previously received a PPP loan.

The post Did the Paycheck Protection Program really help U.S. Producers? appeared first on North America FarmQuip Magazine.

Spring marks the beginning of the spraying season. While crops need to be protected from weeds, insects, fungi, and diseases, agricultural vehicle operators also need to be protected from potentially toxic pesticides and liquid fertilizers when working in the fields. Reliably keeping dust, gases, aerosols, and vapors out of the cabin is critical for their health and safety.

Freudenberg Filtration Technologies offers cabin air filters of all categories to ensure that necessary precautions are taken in keeping with the European norm EN 15695. When applying pesticides, category 4 filters, which offer the highest level of protection, are required.

In the Northern Hemisphere, spring is just around the corner, and usually marks the beginning of planting, and spraying crops. Since many agricultural products such as fruits, vegetables and grains need protection from weeds or diseases, pesticides are and will remain a necessity until sustainable and reliable alternatives are available.

Agricultural vehicle drivers can be exposed to a potential health risk when spraying pesticides. In Europe, the norm EN 15695 is intended to ensure the purity of cabin air for tractors and self-propelled sprayers used in agriculture and forestry. The goal is to limit the operator’s exposure to hazardous substances when applying plant protection products (PPPs) and liquid fertilizers.

The importance of effective category 4 filtration

EN 15695 includes specific requirements regarding cabin filter classification. It defines four categories – with category 4 offering the best protection.

“We recommend that farmers and operators themselves check to see if they are sufficiently protected with their current cabin air filtration solution,”

Giacomo Menzio, who is responsible for the agricultural filter product and service portfolio at Freudenberg Filtration Technologies, emphasizes.

Especially when rounding the bend in a field, the cabin can be exposed to a very high concentration of pesticide “fog”; the same is true when the vehicle slows. Moreover, critical situations can arise on windy days, when the pesticide cloud follows or even engulfs the vehicle cabin.

“Only a high-quality category 4 filter can provide reliable operator protection in such high-risk situations. However, it must be installed in a properly certified category 4 vehicle cabin,”

Menzio explains.

Reliable protection from dust, gases, aerosols, and vapors

The premium micronAir category 4 cabin air filter from Freudenberg Filtration Technologies is designed with a coordinated multi-stage filter system, which adds a unique, high-performance, activated-carbon layer in the final filter stage. These highly efficient filters, which offer excellent protection from dust and aerosols, can even block vaporous contaminants that could be extremely harmful to the operator’s health. They are now original standard equipment for the most important agricultural vehicle manufacturers.

“Cabin air filters with activated carbon have been on the market for some time. However, these filters’ status must be carefully and regularly checked in order to truly protect the operator inside the cabin from outside hazards. In many cases, the quality of the activated carbon is lacking, or the quantity of activated carbon in the filter may be insufficient to guarantee proper performance,”

Menzio adds.

Using the right equipment

In Europe, all new machines are now designed in accordance with the formal standard requirements of EN 15695. To be homologated, they have to fulfill both the cabin requirements (EN 15695-1) and cabin air filter requirements (EN 15695-2). In order to consistently ensure operator safety inside the cabin, it is essential that the cabin air filter’s performance, quality, and certification are examined during maintenance and replacement. To ensure optimal air quality inside the cabin, using original parts and checking the machine’s instruction manual to verify the category of the cabin and filter are recommended.

Freudenberg’s micronAir cabin air filters are tested in accordance with EN 15695 by trusted external institutes. The filter category, depending on the filter application, is indicated on the filter label. After design, development, and performance testing, the filter first undergoes the vehicle manufacturer’s internal approval process followed by the machine’s formal approval process.

Regular maintenance and retrofitting older machines

In newer vehicles, a warning appears on the dashboard display when the category 4 filter needs to be replaced. Filter replacements should always be done according to the recommendations in the machine’s instruction manual, and the actual hours of operation should be checked.

Generally, filter replacement is recommended at least once a year, usually at the start of the new spraying season. Basically, every agricultural vehicle cabin can be equipped with the necessary filter and ventilation system. Since agricultural vehicles can only be operated with a closed cabin to ensure adequate protection, upgrading older models with a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system for additional protection is also recommended.

Both the cabin and filter components have to meet the performance requirements of the EN 15695 norm.

“Safeguarding operators’ health at their workplace isn’t optional – which is why properly labeled, high-performance filtration and air purification systems are an absolute must, especially at this time of the year,”

Menzio concludes.

The post Freudenberg Presents Filtration System to Protect Agricultural Vehicle Drivers appeared first on North America FarmQuip Magazine.

The new V923 expands the Bobcat family of VersaHandler telescopic tool carriers, also known as telehandlers, making it ideal for operators who need increased lift height, reach, and capacity. Featuring a 130-horsepower turbocharged Bobcat engine and heavy-duty drive train, the V923 offers an increased rated operating capacity of 9,000 pounds for more productivity with every lift cycle and unbeatable pushing strength. In addition, the new V923 gives operators the versatility they need in numerous applications with a travel speed of up to 24.5 mph.

A Z-Bar boom linkage delivers a greater range of bucket rotation, an increased dump angle at full height, and increased breakout force to lift material out of a pile and dump it easily. Plus, the new V923 features the power quick-tach attachment mounting system to increase utilization.

Improved performance

The V923 delivers all the power you need for your most challenging tasks. Its 130-horsepower Bobcat engine is designed for high performance and maximum efficiency, enabling operators to do the job while keeping fuel consumption low.

The V923 comes standard with a simple, state-of-the-art non-DPF Tier 4 engine solution. Bobcat engines meet Tier 4 regulations without a diesel particulate filter (DPF). This reduces downtime that occurs with DPF regeneration and long-term DPF maintenance costs – so operators can focus on working. Bobcat engines have a specially designed combustion chamber that minimizes the amount of particulate matter the engine creates. The amounts are low enough that a DPF isn’t needed for Tier 4 compliance, which simplifies maintenance as well as operation.

In addition, the V923 gives operators a heavy-duty hydrostatic transmission that delivers a smooth 0-25 mph stepless driving experience, quick power when needed and high wheel torque for digging and pushing. The low-profile, extendable boom gives operators the power to access a wide range of lift heights and reach lengths with increased visibility to the right side of the machine. The low boom pivot point in the rear also helps make it a powerful machine when pushing. As the machine pushes, more of the weight stays on the front axle.

Operation is safe and easy with the familiarity of a steering wheel and automotive-style foot pedals, along with many additional features to help operators get the job done quickly and efficiently.

Other notable performance features include:

• The load sense hydraulic system is designed for faster boom speeds and heavier lifting, giving operators extra power for smoother control when loaded, and the fastest boom cycle times possible when empty.
• A patented hydraulic lift system provides advanced high-flow technology to optimize lift capabilities while providing high-speed movement – plus unrivaled multifunctioning performance during the lift cycle.
• For durability and confidence when working on most intensive jobs, the V923 is equipped with reinforced heavy-duty axles with large lug nuts and a reinforced central differential gear. Heavy-duty universal joints are designed to handle tough working conditions, and the steering cylinder is protected in the upper position.
• The new, heavier-duty lift cylinder allows for a rated operating capacity of 9,000 pounds and improved lifting performance.
• Enable boom float while moving on uneven ground for smooth performance with attachments.

Increased machine protection

Bobcat has designed all its telehandlers with the same robust box-welded frame for enhanced rigidity – plus a low center of gravity for great overall stability. Its shielded bottom plate protects vital components. The engine, cooling system, and many critical components are well-protected within the center of the chassis, ensuring minimal wear and tear due to job site obstacles or harsh terrain.

For additional protection, the V923 is designed with a sealed engine compartment that helps shut out dust and debris, ensuring long component life. Plus, the radiator, oil cooler, and intake air coolers are mounted side by side, carefully located to receive the same quality and temperature of air, which provides efficient, consistent cooling ability, even in the most severe and dirty conditions.

In addition, an automatic reverse cooling fan gives operators the ability to keep the radiator area cleaner for longer – extending productivity and uptime while reducing the immediate need to clean debris by hand. Simply flip a switch to reverse the cooling fan or set it to automatically reverse at 30-, 45-, 60- or 90-minute intervals to purge the system of dust and debris.

The new V923 is designed with optional window guards. The optional front and top window guards are designed to protect operators and the machine from falling and flying debris. In addition, the V923 cabs are designed and tested to Roll-Over Protection Structure (ROPS) and Falling Object Protective Structure (FOPS) standards.

The V923 has a variety of other uptime protection features including:

• Fine mesh intake screen to help prevent large debris from entering the engine basket and plugging the radiator.
• Diesel fuel is contained in a durable, rust-free polypropylene tank to minimize condensation and contamination of the fuel system.
• Battery run-down protection that automatically shuts down after a predetermined time and voltage level, preventing accidental battery discharge.
• Machine shutdown protection system to continuously monitor engine coolant, hydraulic engine oil, and other vital machine functions.
• Cylinders are strategically located in areas that are less prone to damaging contact on the job, protecting them from harm.

Selectable steering and travel modes

The versatility of the V923 is endless with three steering and travel modes to give operators application-matched maneuverability.

The V923 has three steering types and four travel speeds to fit the needs of a variety of jobs.

• All-wheel steer: Helps with quick and tight turns.
• Front-wheel steer: Enables top-speed travel, eliminating the need to haul the machine on a trailer from the job site.
• Crab steer: Precise side-to-side positioning.

Select from three travel modes that provide more precise movement in numerous applications.

• 2-Speed travel option: Offers two-speed ranges, each with its own high and low setting, for improved productivity and better maneuverability.
• Speed management: Adjusts travel speed independently from the engine speed. Operators can use their accelerator pedal to set the engine speed to the optimal setting for the attachment they are operating, then dial in their desired travel speed.
• Inching control: Reduces drive speed without reducing power to the attachment, enabling slower, more precise control without sacrificing productivity.

Enhanced operator comfort

The V923 was carefully designed for the best visibility from every angle. The low-profile boom sits below operator eye level to provide a better view of the operator’s surroundings. Front, top, and rear window wipers clear away moisture and minimize the buildup of dust, debris, and mud. Multiple mirrors on the operator’s left and right assist them when working in confined areas. An optional rear mirror kit and boom work light kit are also available.

The V923 has a unique wraparound rear window that gives operators a completely unobstructed line of sight to the side and rear of the machine. Plus, an easy-to-read instrumentation panel gives operators an edge in equipment operation. The backlit display panel monitors major functions and features intuitive attachment controls, operation lights, warnings, and an hour meter for quick service checks.

A boom cushioning suspension system makes it easier for operators to handle the load, providing a smoother motion as the attachment angles to its minimum or maximum pitch, or when the boom reaches full retraction. Activating ride control reduces material spillage and enables operators to travel at faster speeds for increased productivity. Thanks to its dampening effect, this feature also increases comfort by offering a smoother ride when traveling across uneven terrain.

An enclosed cab with heat and air conditioning is standard for V923 telescopic tool carriers, minimizing dirt and dust inside the operating area and keeping the operator refreshed through the workday. Automotive-style vents allow operators to point the air where they need it, providing enhanced comfort in all weather conditions. In addition, a single intuitive joystick allows operators to control several functions, including travel direction, lift and tilt functions, boom extension, and auxiliary hydraulics from the cab. A high-comfort air-suspension seat adjusts to the operator’s weight, enabling maximum comfort on the job site. Plus, the V923 is available with a keyless start option, giving operators the convenience of keyless start and the added security of an owner-defined numeric code.

Unmatched attachment versatility

Available on the V923, is the power quick-tach attachment mounting system, which provides robust, compact attachment versatility. The hydraulic lock function allows operators to change non-hydraulic attachments safely and quickly without leaving the cab.

The V923 is approved for use with the following attachments:

• Bale fork (accessory for rigid pallet fork frame)
• Bucket, general purpose: 93 inches
• Bucket, grapple: 96 inches
• Bucket, light material (2.6-yard volume): 96 inches
• Pallet fork, floating
• Pallet fork, rigid
• Pallet fork, side-shift

Quick Look: V923 VersaHandler telescopic tool carrier

Horsepower: 130-hp, non-DPF Bobcat Tier 4 diesel engine
Operating weight: 18,158 lb.
Maximum rated lift capacity: 9,041lb.
Maximum lift height: 277 in.
Maximum reach: 162.3 in.
Auxiliary hydraulic flow: 39.6 gpm
Travel speed, low (Gear 1): 3.7 mph
Travel speed, high (Gear 2): 24.5 mph
Three steering modes: Front, all-wheel and crab

Source: Bobcat Company

The post Bobcat Presents the New V923 VersaHandler Tool Carrier appeared first on North America FarmQuip Magazine.